Discrete Dirichlet Problem. What's Wrong with My Solution?

Discrete Dirichlet Problem. What's Wrong with My Solution?
$\begingroup$

I'm reading Artin's Algebra and stumbled upon this miscellaneous question. Chapter 1 Excercise M11. I will post the problem here.

This is my progress up to now.

(a)

The lattice points $(0,0),(\pm 1,0),(0,\pm 1)$ are in the region $R$ and they map to $\{x_{0,0},x_{1,0},x_{0,1},x_{-1,0},x_{0,-1}\}$

Due to the given $\beta$ function all the neighbouring lattice points which are in the region $\bar{R}$ map to $0$ or $1$ depending whether they are above or below the x-axis. (See the definition of this function).

Therefore, we can get 5 linear equations which satisfy the Laplace equation. These linear equations have variables $x_{0,0},x_{1,0},x_{0,1},x_{-1,0},x_{0,-1}$

we get the following equations.

$$ x_{0,0} = \frac{1}{4} (x_{1,0}+x_{0,1}+x_{-1,0}+x_{0,-1})\\ x_{1,0} = \frac{1}{4} (x_{0,0} + 1)\\ x_{0,1} = \frac{1}{4} (x_{0,0} + 3)\\ x_{-1,0} = \frac{1}{4} (x_{0,0} + 1)\\ x_{0,-1} = \frac{1}{4} (x_{0,0}) $$

This is analogous to, $$ \begin{pmatrix} -4 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1\\ -1 & 4 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ -1 & 0 & 4 & 0 & 0\\ -1 & 0 & 0 & 4 & 0\\ -1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 \end{pmatrix} * \begin{pmatrix} x_{0,0} \\ x_{1,0} \\ x_{0,1} \\ x_{-1,0} \\ x_{0,-1} \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \\ 3 \\1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$

By solving this I got the following results (I had to solve this on a computer since I couldn't find a way to row-reduce the coefficient matrix),

$$ \begin{pmatrix} x_{0,0} \\ x_{1,0} \\ x_{0,1} \\ x_{-1,0} \\ x_{0,-1} \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0.41667 \\ 0.35417 \\ 0.85417 \\ 0.35417 \\ 0.10417 \end{pmatrix} $$

(b)

This is where I get stuck. It states that a harmonic function takes on its maximal value on the boundary. But by the results, I obtained in part (a), the boundary values are $x_{1,0},x_{0,1},x_{-1,0},x_{0,-1}$ and some of them are clearly less than $x_{0,0}$.

What's wrong with my solution?

$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer

$\begingroup$

The maximum principle doesn't state that all boundary values will be larger than non-boundary ones. The only thing it says is that the maximum will be achieved on the boundary. For example consider the identity function on $[0,1]$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Chloe Bennett
Author

Chloe Bennett

Chloe Bennett explores the intersection of pop culture, streaming entertainment, digital trends, and contemporary lifestyle. Her weekly commentary reaches thousands of culture enthusiasts.