Linear Algebra Proofs

Linear Algebra Proofs
$\begingroup$

I'm always having difficulties with what actually suffices as a proof, and what is obvious enough to not have to prove it. Here some I have those problems with.

Let $S=\{u_1,u_2,...,u_n\}$ be a finite set of vectors. Prove that $S$ is linearly dependent if and only if $u_1=0$ or $u_{k+1} \in <\{u_1,u_2,...,u_k\}>$ for some $k (1 \leq k \lt n)$.

I think it's obvious since 1. ${0}$ is linearly dependent and 2. if $u_{k+1}$ is in the mentioned span, than it is a linear combination of other vectors of $S$ and thus $S$ is linearly dependent. So much to my thinking, but how do I appropriately express something like this?

Let $M$ be a square upper triangular Matrix with nonzero diagonal entries. Prove that the columns of $M$ are linearly independent.

I think: If you regard every column as a vector, each has a different direction. But again, I guess this doesn't really count as a mathematical proof. How to express it then?

Let $V$ be a vector space over a field of characteristic not equal to two. a) Let $u$ and $v$ be distinct vectors in V. Prove that $\{u,v\}$ is linearly independent if and only if $\{u+v,u-v\}$ is linearly independent. ( b) - the same with $\{u,v,w\}$ and $\{u+v,u+w,v+w\}$.

My proof for a):

$a_1u + a_2v$ implies $a_1=a_2=0$

If $$b_1(u+v) + b_2(u-v) = (b_1+b_2)u+(b_1-b_2)v = 0$$ then $$b_1+b_2 = b_1-b_2 = 0$$ thus $b_1 = b_2=0$

Now do I need to write additional stuff to prove the other direction (something like:

Since $$b_1(u+v) + b_2(u-v) = (b_1+b_2)u+(b_1-b_2)v = 0$$ only if $b_1 = b_2 = 0$ I can choose no $a_1,a_2 \neq 0$ for I could always split it into $b_1$ and $b_2$ which were not zero, there fore the equation couldn't be zero either.),

or would the first part already be enough?

Thanks a lot ! I have a lot to get used to :P

$\endgroup$

1 Answer

$\begingroup$

In the future, please limit yourself to one problem in your post. You're more likely to get helpful responses than if you list several problems.

For #1, you have given an argument for the "if" direction, but you haven't addressed the "only if" direction. You must show that if $S$ is linearly dependent, then one of the two cases stated holds.

For #2, you should take a linear combination of the columns and argue that each of the coefficients is zero. Your argument about directions is not valid. You can select three vectors in $\mathbb{R}^2$ that all have different directions. Those three vectors will be linearly dependent (why?).

For #3, your definitely need to say something for the other direction. Otherwise, you will have only proven the "only if" direction. For the "if" direction, you assume that $\{u+v, u-v\}$ are linearly independent (i.e. $b_1 (u+v) + b_2(u-v) = 0 \Rightarrow b_1 = b_2 = 0$. Then, to prove that $\{u, v\}$ is linearly independent, you assume that $a_1 u + a_2 v = 0$ and must show that $a_1 = a_2 = 0$. Your proof will be similar to the other direction, using an algebraic calculation to get equations on $a_1$ and $a_2$ whose only solution is $a_1 = a_2 = 0$.

Hope that helps. Keep practicing and asking questions - that's the best way to learn how to do proofs.

$\endgroup$
4

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

David Miller
Author

David Miller

David Miller brings 15 years of experience in global economics, personal finance strategy, and market dynamics. He specializes in turning complex economic trends into actionable insights for everyday readers.