Second Order Linear Odes and Analytic Coefficients

Second Order Linear Odes and Analytic Coefficients
$\begingroup$

A second order, linear, homogeneous ODE can be expressed as:

$$a(x)y''(x) + b(x)y'(x) + c(x)y(x) = 0$$

I have only a basic knowledge about differential equations. However, all the texts state that: in order to find a solution at a specific point $x = x_0$, the functions

$\displaystyle \frac{b(x)}{a(x)}$ and $\displaystyle \frac{c(x)}{a(x)}$

must be analytic at $x_0$.

For example, from this document:

A linear, analytic equation is one for which the coefficient functions are analytic and therefore possess convergent power-series expansions [...]. The simple conclusion will be that the solutions also possess convergent power-series expansions.

Why, if the coefficient functions are analytic, there is guarantee that the solution is analytic, too, and vice-versa?

They are only the coefficients of the unknown function $y(x)$ in that equation, not the function $y(x)$ itself, so how can they affect the function in such a heavy way? If for example $a(x_0) = 0$, how can this determine also the form of $y(x)$ at $x_0$? I can't find the link between these two facts.

$\endgroup$
6

2 Answers

$\begingroup$

It's easier to see if we take it down to first order. Let's look at $$ a(x)y'(x) + b(x)y(x) = 0$$

To solve this equation, we can simply separate the variables and integrate, so $$ \int\frac{y'(x)}{y(x)}\text dx = c - \int \frac{b(x)}{a(x)}\text dx \\ \Rightarrow y(x) = C\exp\left( \int f(x)\text dx \right) = C\exp(F(x)) $$ where $f(x) = -\frac{b(x)}{a(x)}$ and $F'(x) = f(x)$. The question here is, when is the solution $y(x)$ an analytic function at some given point $x_0$? Well, an analytic function is one whose derivatives all exist at $x_0$, so let's find the derivatives of $y$. The expression for the $n$-th derivative of $\exp(F(x))$ is

$$\frac{\text d^n \exp(F(x))}{\text dx^n}\biggr|_{x=x_0} = \exp(F(x_0)) \sum_{k=0}^n \frac{1}{k!} \sum_{j=0}^k (-1)^j \binom{k}{j}F(x_0)^j \frac{\text d^n F(x)^{k-j}}{\text dx^n}\biggr|_{x=x_0} $$

The only time this expression doesn't exist for some $n$ is if the $p$-th derivative of $F$ doesn't exist for some $0\leq p\leq n$. In other words, $\exp(F(x))$ is analytic iff $F(x)$ is. Since $F$ is the integral of $f$, $F$ is analytic iff $f$ is analytic, and recall that $f = -\frac{b(x)}{a(x)}$. Thus,

$$ y(x) \text{ is analytic } \Leftrightarrow \frac{b(x)}{a(x)} \text{ is analytic. } $$

The same idea is true for higher order equations; the only issue is that "integrating" higher order equations isn't as simple as actually integrating a function as it was in the first order case. However, making use of the Picard iteration, we can show the exact same thing for higher order equations (albeit with a lot more work).

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Given a second order ODE

$$ a(x)y''(x)+b(x)y'(x)+c(x)y(x)=0 \tag{1} \label{eq1} $$

We can introduce a new variable $z(x)=y'(x)$ and reduce the equation to a first order system (the same idea works for higher order equations).

$$ \begin{align} y'(x)-z(x)&=0 \\ a(x)z'(x)+b(x)z(x)+c(x)y(x)&=0 \\ \end{align}\tag{2} \label{eq2} $$

We can write the system in a matrix-vector form

$$ \mathbf{A}(x)\cdot\vec{Y}'(x)+\mathbf{B}(x)\cdot\vec{Y}=0 \tag{3} \label{eq3} $$

where

$$ \mathbf{A}(x)=\left(\begin{matrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & a(x) \\ \end{matrix}\right) \tag{4} \label{eq4} $$

$$ \mathbf{B}(x)=\left(\begin{matrix} 0 & -1 \\ c(x) & b(x) \\ \end{matrix}\right)\tag{5} \label{eq5} $$

$$ \vec{Y}(x)=\left(\begin{matrix} y(x) \\ z(x) \\ \end{matrix}\right) \tag{6} \label{eq6} $$

if $a(x)\neq 0$ in the integration domain we can find $\mathbf{A}^{-1}$ given by

$$ \mathbf{A}^{-1}(x)=\left(\begin{matrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & \frac{1}{a(x)} \\ \end{matrix}\right) \tag{7}\label{eq7} $$

Using $\eqref{eq7}$ we can rewrite $\eqref{eq3}$ in the following way: $$ \vec{Y}'(x)=-\mathbf{A}^{-1}(x)\cdot\mathbf{B}(x)\cdot\vec{Y}=-\mathbf{C}(x)\cdot\vec{Y} \tag{8} \label{eq8} $$ where

$$ \mathbf{C}(x)=\left(\begin{matrix} 0 & -1 \\ \frac{c(x)}{a(x)} & \frac{b(x)}{a(x)} \\ \end{matrix}\right). \tag{9}\label{eq9} $$ Notice that $\mathbf{C}$ contains the ratio of the coefficients. If $\mathbf{C}(x_1)\cdot\mathbf{C}(x_2)=\mathbf{C}(x_2)\cdot\mathbf{C}(x_1)$, $\forall\{x_1,x_2\}\in D(\mathbf{C})$ the solution to $\eqref{eq8}$ is similar to the first order scalar case:

$$ \vec{Y}=\mathbf{K\cdot\mathrm{e}}^{-\int \mathbf{C}(x)\mathrm{d}x} \tag{10} \label{eq10} $$ where we use the matrix exponential and $\mathbf{K}$ is a constant matrix. In that case, we required $\frac{c(x)}{a(x)}=k_1,\frac{b(x)}{a(x)}=k_2$, where $k_1,k_2$ are constants. A general solution is given by the Magnus expansion (see ref. 1 and ref. 2).

Perhaps, it is easier to analyze the effect of the coefficients for a first order equation: $$ y'=-\alpha(x)y $$

the solution in this case is

$$ y=\kappa\mathrm{e}^{-\int \alpha(x)\mathrm{d}x} $$

Therefore, the solution is the composition of $\int \alpha(x)\mathrm{d}x$ and the exponential function. Given a $C^{n}$ function at $x_0$, its integral is $C^{n+1}$. For example, consider the following step-like function: $$ \alpha(x)=\left\{\begin{matrix} 0 & x<0 \\ 1 & x\geq 0 \\ \end{matrix}\right. $$

It is discontinuous at $x = 0$; its integral in $(-\infty,x]$ is a $C^0$ function (i.e. a continuous function):

$$ \int_{-\infty}^x\alpha(s)\mathrm{d}s=\left\{\begin{matrix} k & x<0 \\ k+x & x\geq 0 \\ \end{matrix}\right. $$ where $k$ is a constant. Regarding the questions:

  1. Why, if the coefficient functions are analytic, there is guarantee that the solution is analytic, too, and vice-versa? Given the integration of the matrix $\mathbf{C}$, you need the ratio of the coefficient to be analytic, i.e., $C^{\infty}$ in order to get a solution which is $C^{\infty}$ as well.

  2. They are only the coefficients of the unknown function $y(x)$ in that equation, not the function $y(x)$ itself, so how can they affect the function in such a heavy way? Given the solution $\eqref{eq10}$, we see that the coefficients fully determine the solution. Therefore, they strongly affect the resulting solution (they are part of the solution).

  3. If for example $a(x_0)=0$, how can this determine also the form of $y(x)$ at $x_0$? In that case you find a singularity at $x_0$, the solution won't be analytic in that case (it may be $C^n$ in the best case).

$\endgroup$
5

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Alexander Ross
Author

Alexander Ross

Alexander Ross has covered the video game industry for a decade, writing deep dives on game design, esports tournaments, VR developments, and gaming culture.