The Difference Between Inverse Function and a Function That Is Invertible?

The Difference Between Inverse Function and a Function That Is Invertible?
$\begingroup$

My discrete mathematics book says:

But I read an answer, , said:

["...]There are invertible functions which are not bijective,[..."]

And to the same question in the link, an answer said:

["]A function is invertible if and only if it is injective[."]

So for a function to have a inverse, it must be bijective. But any function that is injective is invertible, as long as such inverse defined on a subset of the codomain of original one, i.e. the image of the original function?

$\endgroup$
3

2 Answers

$\begingroup$

It all depends on the co-domain of your function.

When you have a function $$f:A\to B$$ which is one-to-one but not onto $B$, you may restrict your co-domain to a subset of $B'\subset B$ which is the range of $f$.

For example $$f:N \to N $$ defined by $$f(n)=2n$$ is not onto but it is one-to-one.

If we define, $$f^* : N\to 2N$$ with the same definition $f^*(n)=2n$

We have an inverse function, $(f^*)^{-1} (n) = n/2.$

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

When people said a function is "invertible", they mean it can be made invertible. And the rigorous definition of inverse function of $f$ in my book is:


$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

James H. Sterling
Author

James H. Sterling

James Sterling reports on renewable energy developments, climate policy, ecological conservation, and green tech innovations around the globe.