How to Represent "Not an Empty Set"?

How to Represent "Not an Empty Set"?
$\begingroup$

I'm writing a academic paper and need to represent "A is not the empty set". What is usual way for professional mathematicians?

My idea is:

$|A| > 0$

However, using the emptyset $\emptyset$ might be more intuitive:

$A\ != \emptyset$

But, I know "!=" is not permissible in math community (only in programmers).

Update

Sorry, I fixed the second equation: $|A|\ != \emptyset \rightarrow A\ != \emptyset$

$\endgroup$
9

6 Answers

$\begingroup$

It is perfectly fine to write $|A|>0$. However, the simplest and most common way to write this in symbols would be $$A\neq\emptyset.$$ Note that you don't want to write $|A|\neq \emptyset$, as it is $A$ itself which you are saying is not the empty set, rather than the cardinality of $A$.

(The standard symbol in mathematics for "not equal" is $\neq$, rather than $!{=}$. You can make this symbol in $\LaTeX$ with the command \neq.)

As mentioned in user21820's nice answer below, though, it is also very common to just write this in words ("$A$ is not empty" or "$A$ is nonempty") instead of symbols.

$\endgroup$
14
$\begingroup$

None of the other answers so far mention that professional mathematicians don't specially go out of the way to convert everything to symbols. "$A$ is non-empty" is indeed the most common way to express the statement. Furthermore, for complicated structures it is almost always expressed this way, such as:

Given any non-empty chain of fields ordered by inclusion, their union is also a field.

$\endgroup$
17
$\begingroup$

$A \neq \varnothing$

[LaTeX: A \neq \varnothing]

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

$A \neq \emptyset$

Thats how it is commonly written

$\endgroup$
$\begingroup$

How about: $(\exists x)\, x\in A$? Alternatively, one could say that $A$ is inhabited. This usage avoids needless negation which is problematic constructively speaking, and is common in constructive mathematics.

$\endgroup$
8
$\begingroup$

Let $A$ denote a set.

In constructive mathematics, there's a difference between the statements '$A$ is non-empty,' which is defined to mean that $A$ is not isomorphic to $\emptyset$, and '$A$ is inhabited,' which is defined to mean that $A$ has at least one element, i.e. $\exists a \in A(\mathrm{True})$. Thus, depending on their standpoint and interests, a professional mathematician will probably write one of '$A$ is non-empty' or '$A$ is inhabited.'

Classically, these are equivalent.

$\endgroup$
2

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Robert Thorne
Author

Robert Thorne

Robert Thorne covers electric vehicle innovations, autonomous driving systems, global mobility trends, and automotive engineering developments.