Is the Gradient Operator Surjective?

Is the Gradient Operator Surjective?
$\begingroup$

Let $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^{n}$ be open and bounded with Lipschitz boundary. Is the gradient operator $\nabla :H^{1} ( \Omega ) \rightarrow L^{2} ( \Omega )$ surjective? Here $H^{1} ( \Omega ) =W^{1,2} ( \Omega )$ the Sobolev space of real valued functions in $L^{2}$ with weak derivative in $L^{2}$.

For unbounded sets in $\mathbb{R}$ the answer is clearly no, since any compactly supported continuous function is in $L^{2} ( \mathbb{R} )$ but has non integrable primitive.

So, if I try to disprove this for bounded sets, my usual simple test for these things, the set $( 0,1 ) \subset \mathbb{R}$ and the function $x^{\alpha}$, which is in $L^{p}$ iff $\alpha >-n/p$ doesn't really help much as a candidate. Integrating is always possible and yields a function in $H^{1} ( \Omega )$.

Ideas? Solution anyone? What about vector valued functions?

$\endgroup$
2

1 Answer

$\begingroup$

Let $\mathcal{D}(\Omega)^n$ denote the set of $C^\infty$, compact supported vector fields defined in $\Omega$. Define $$\mathcal{V}=\{\varphi\in \mathcal{D}(\Omega)^n:\ \operatorname{div}\varphi=0 \}$$

Denote by $H$ the closure of $\mathcal{V}$ in $L^2(\Omega)^n$. It can be showed that $$H=\{u\in L^2(\Omega)^n:\ \operatorname{div} u=0,\ \gamma(u)=0\}$$

$$H^{\perp}=\{u\in L^2(\Omega)^n:\ \exists\ p\in H^1(\Omega),\ u=\nabla p\}$$

where $\gamma$ is defined here and $H^{\perp}$ is the orthogonal of $H$ in $L^2(\Omega)^n$. Therefore $$L^2(\Omega)^n=H\oplus H^\perp$$

For references take a look in this book of Boyer and Fabrie, in section 3.3.

$\endgroup$
2

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Robert Thorne
Author

Robert Thorne

Robert Thorne covers electric vehicle innovations, autonomous driving systems, global mobility trends, and automotive engineering developments.