Elliptic Coordinates - Inverting the Transformation

Elliptic Coordinates - Inverting the Transformation
$\begingroup$

The standard way to transform elliptic coordinates $(\mu, \nu)$ $\ to$ Cartesian coordinates $(x,y)$:

$x = a \cosh(\mu) \cos(\nu)$

$y = a \sinh(\mu) \sin(\nu)$

Is there any way to get the transformation $(x,y)$ to $(\mu,\nu)$? Meaning is there a way to find:

$\mu = f(x,y)$

$\nu = g(x,y)$

I'm guessing that it would involve $\sinh^{-1}$'s and $\cosh^{-1}$'s, if it was possible to do this at all.

$\endgroup$
3

1 Answer

$\begingroup$

According to this the complex form of the system is $x+iy=\cosh(\mu+i\nu).$ To me that was a surprise but it checks easily using the definitions of sinh, cosh, and even/odd properties of sine and cosine. In a formula reference book I found that $$\cosh^{-1}(z)=\ln(z+\sqrt{z^2-1})=i \arccos z.$$ I'm not expert enough to say anything about choosing the log branch for the log or the arccosine here.

Note: One has to use the fact that $\cosh z=\cosh -z$ when inverting via $\cosh^{-1}$ in order to assure the relation $\mu \ge 0$ in the transformation. Given $z$ if left as $x+iy,$ extracting the squareroot inside the log is messy to say the least.

$\endgroup$
1

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Alexander Ross
Author

Alexander Ross

Alexander Ross has covered the video game industry for a decade, writing deep dives on game design, esports tournaments, VR developments, and gaming culture.