Using Null in C++? [Duplicate]

Using Null in C++? [Duplicate]

Possible Duplicate:
Do you use NULL or 0 (zero) for pointers in C++?

Is it a good idea to use NULL in C++ or just the value 0?

Is there a special circumstance using NULL in C code calling from C++? Like SDL?

8

5 Answers

In C++ NULL expands to 0 or 0L. See this quote from Stroustrup's FAQ:

Should I use NULL or 0?

In C++, the definition of NULL is 0, so there is only an aesthetic difference. I prefer to avoid macros, so I use 0. Another problem with NULL is that people sometimes mistakenly believe that it is different from 0 and/or not an integer. In pre-standard code, NULL was/is sometimes defined to something unsuitable and therefore had/has to be avoided. That's less common these days.

If you have to name the null pointer, call it nullptr; that's what it's called in C++11. Then, "nullptr" will be a keyword.

7

The downside of NULL in C++ is that it is a define for 0. This is a value that can be silently converted to pointer, a bool value, a float/double, or an int.

That is not very type safe and has lead to actual bugs in an application I worked on.

Consider this:

void Foo(int i);
void Foo(Bar* b);
void Foo(bool b);


main()
{
     Foo(0);         
     Foo(NULL); // same as Foo(0)
} 

C++11 defines a nullptr that is convertible to a null pointer but not to other scalars. This is supported in all modern C++ compilers, including VC++ as of 2008. In older versions of GCC there is a similar feature, but then it was called __null.

From crtdbg.h (and many other headers):

#ifndef NULL
#ifdef __cplusplus
#define NULL    0
#else
#define NULL    ((void *)0)
#endif
#endif

Therefore NULL is 0, at least on the Windows platform. So no, not that I know of.

I never use NULL in my C or C++ code. 0 works just fine, as does if (ptrname). Any competent C or C++ programmer should know what those do.

4

Assuming that you don't have a library or system header that defines NULL as for example (void*)0 or (char*)0 it's fine. I always tend to use 0 myself as it is by definition the null pointer. In c++0x you'll have nullptr available so the question won't matter as much anymore.

Robert Thorne
Author

Robert Thorne

Robert Thorne covers electric vehicle innovations, autonomous driving systems, global mobility trends, and automotive engineering developments.