"The Big Chill"

"The Big Chill"

This movie has not aged well.

by Anonymousreply 82April 19, 2018 11:29 PM

I was one of the few who never liked it.

I found it creepy.

by Anonymousreply 2October 24, 2012 2:13 AM

I have one of their refrigerators. The stove looks interesting, but you could get a tiny Agga for that price.

by Anonymousreply 3October 24, 2012 2:29 AM

I loathed JoBeth Williams' character.

by Anonymousreply 4October 24, 2012 2:39 AM

I liked it when it was called "Return of the Secaucus Seven."

by Anonymousreply 5October 24, 2012 2:44 AM

I loved it for the soundtrack and for Meg Tilly.

by Anonymousreply 6October 24, 2012 3:36 AM

I disagree. It has aged fine. It was a time capsule WHEN IT WAS RELEASED. These were boomers out of college about fifteen years. That put it at about 1983, when the film was released. What hasn't "aged" well? The movie is SET in that time period.

by Anonymousreply 7October 24, 2012 5:04 AM

Even worse was that fucking movie "Grand Canyon".

by Anonymousreply 9October 24, 2012 5:09 AM

It was fun. And Kevin Costner managed to have a career despite being almost completely cut from the movie.

by Anonymousreply 10October 24, 2012 5:10 AM

It was released in 1983 and the clothing, etc. makes it look a little dated now but the story and message are timeless, IMO.

by Anonymousreply 11October 24, 2012 5:16 AM

R10- wasn't he completely cut?

by Anonymousreply 12October 24, 2012 6:03 AM

I think the corpse we saw was Costner.

by Anonymousreply 13October 24, 2012 6:13 AM

Eh, why would it? Its about a very specific generation set at their crossroads, which probably only connects fully with that group.

by Anonymousreply 14October 24, 2012 5:35 PM

What exactly WAS the message? That people grow up and apart and its OK for your dead friend's piece to hook up with his friend who is still living while you allow your husband to fuck your friend in an attempt to get her knocked up?

by Anonymousreply 15October 24, 2012 5:39 PM

I watched it for the first time last year and it didn't strike me as incredibly dated.

by Anonymousreply 16October 24, 2012 5:45 PM

There are lots of movies that could be said not to age well. Movies that show black people as shuffling, lazy, sho'nuff characters, for example. The Big Chill was a "contemporary" movie -- meaning it addressed concerns and relationships of the time period when it was released.

I watched Casablanca, expecting some wowser of a movie, but didn't find it much better or worse than lots of movies of the same time period. But other people revere it. They find something in it that I don't, and good for them. I'm glad they love it. I prefer The Third Man, but I can see how some people may not relate to it -- especially people who did not live through the Cold War. Same with the miniseries "Tinker Tailor, Soldier, Spy." It was far more realistic than the later movie -- because it was filmed during the Cold War, which it depicted. But people who have no memory of the Cold War might find it dated and a real snore.

by Anonymousreply 17October 24, 2012 5:45 PM

R15, the message is that times change and the world moves on. Alex couldn't live in the moved-on world, so he killed himself and life went on without him. His friends will fondly remember him, but they will get on with their lives, whatever life has in store for them.

by Anonymousreply 18October 24, 2012 5:48 PM

The director did nothing but silly shitty leftwing movies. TBC is awful, hated it then, hate it now.

by Anonymousreply 19October 24, 2012 5:49 PM

[quote]shitty leftwing movies

Huh?

by Anonymousreply 20October 24, 2012 5:54 PM

Have you seen them? They are droning affairs. I like good leftwing movies, his are shit.

by Anonymousreply 21October 24, 2012 6:00 PM

You could see the Big Chill as an evolutionary film. Alex the rigid physicist can't adapt to the new environment, so he doesn't survive. All the other characters adapt to the changing world. They "sell out." They cannot remain their old college selves. The Vietnam War is over. The Civil Rights movement was over.

The lawyer wanted to represent poor oppressed individuals, but all she got was criminals. The journalist could only thrive and make s decent living at People magazine. The sneaker maker could support his family in a great home by exploiting the new fitness craze. The housewife was bored with her dull life and wanted some action.

The 60s became the 80s in The Big Chill. The 80s was all about shucking off the past, selling out and moving on into the world of insider trading, celebrity gossip, real estate and fooling around. It was a presicient movie about where America was heading. The William Hurt character might not make it. He's dropping out with the hot dopey chick, biding time having sex and seeing what happens. He's still depressed and not sure about the future. He might end up like Alex, whose hot gf couldn't save him from hating the new world.

by Anonymousreply 22October 24, 2012 6:03 PM

I assumed OP meant the film hadn't "aged well" in the sense that it no longer seems well directed or acted. Lots of acclaimed films from the 1980s are almost unwatchable now (and music unlistenable) owing to dated production and performance techniques.

by Anonymousreply 23October 24, 2012 6:11 PM

[quote]dated production and performance techniques.

Are there well known examples of this?

by Anonymousreply 24October 24, 2012 6:15 PM

r7's right, the movie is specifically about baby boomers in 1983. So r11 complaining about the clothes being out of fashion is just ridiculous. It's fine not to like the movie, I liked it when it was new but haven't seen it in decades and have no intention of seeing it again. And I do think baby-boomers tend to be pushy and narcissistic, they're used to being catered to. All my baby-boomer older siblings are assholes. It's just the complaint about the movie being "dated" that is misplaced.

by Anonymousreply 25October 24, 2012 6:16 PM

It was an overrated cliche-ridden bore when it first came out.

by Anonymousreply 26October 24, 2012 6:21 PM

It's held up as well as my breasts in the shower scene.

by Anonymousreply 27October 25, 2012 1:43 AM

I love this movie and watch it often. The music, the friendships from college, U of M (my school), the drugs, the dialogue.

It's way better than Return of the Secaucus Seven, which has an obvious influence.

It's a very 80s movie, like The Breakfast Club for adults.

by Anonymousreply 28October 25, 2012 6:18 AM

[quote]And I do think baby-boomers tend to be pushy and narcissistic

Not just "tend," hon.

by Anonymousreply 29October 25, 2012 6:36 AM

[quote]It was an overrated cliche-ridden bore when it first came out.

Sooo true.

It was the 60s music that fooled people into thinking it had some weight.

Otherwise, it stank.

by Anonymousreply 30October 25, 2012 7:02 AM

Secaucus 7 > Big Chill > Peter's Friends >>> Grand Canyon

by Anonymousreply 31October 25, 2012 7:32 AM

R28, The Breakfast Club was The Big Chill for teenagers.

People who go on about The Return of The Seacaucus Seven have obviously never seen it. It's so low budget and poorly acted as to be unwatchable. But you go ahead and enjoy it.

by Anonymousreply 32October 25, 2012 8:00 PM

Like Gen X and Y and the Millenials aren't narcissistic, too, at least the boomers had creativity and used their brains instead of the internet. I think this is a great film, a character study, not very many films today have any character development, it's all "don't bore us, get to the chorus" or explosion or next shock effect.

by Anonymousreply 33October 25, 2012 8:19 PM

This film was supposed to be a big deal when it was released. I never saw it. I've seen a few clips of it. I remember one scene where I think they're in a kitchen and an oldies song starts playing and they start dancing like idiots. At least that's how I remember it. That scene alone made me NOT want to see it.

by Anonymousreply 34October 25, 2012 9:19 PM

The making of documentary is interesting because it points out that Lawrence Kasdan made it in a way that the music was coordinated with the punchlines.

by Anonymousreply 35October 25, 2012 11:31 PM

Loved Big Chill when it came out. Saw it several times in the theatre.

Having all those oldies songs incorporated into the soundtrack was new at the time. Prior to that, a movie might have an old song or two, but not the entire soundtrack. Big Chill is often credited with proving there was a market for older songs and the explosion of oldies stations in the mid 80s.

Yes, the plot is the same as Secaucus Seven. But as has been said, Secaucus is not very well acted or directed.

by Anonymousreply 36October 26, 2012 4:05 AM

You can't always get what you want

by Anonymousreply 37October 26, 2012 4:13 AM

[quote]an oldies song starts playing and they start dancing

Is that where this started?

by Anonymousreply 38October 26, 2012 4:02 PM

Oldies songs, especially Motown songs, in a movie where the dorky white people dance around to them started with the Big Chill. It's such a cliche now, but at the time it was fresh and innovative.

I'm in my 30's and it's hard to believe there was a generation SO entitled that a few years after graduation from a state school they could ALL have such big jobs or lucrative careers (even the drug dealer). But actually there really was!

This was one that started the awful screenwriting trend of everyone defined by their jobs (and they're ALLLL successful!): Glenn's a doctor, Place is a lawyer, Kevin a shoe exec, Tom not just an actor but a TV STAR, Goldblum not a reporter but a writer for PEOPLE MAGAZINE, on and on, puke.

by Anonymousreply 39October 26, 2012 4:34 PM

People who say they prefer Secaucus 7 have obviously never seen it or at least not more than once. It is so poorly acted - OTT, completely unbelievable performances - and so poorly filmed with terrible audio. It's not the classic some people would like to believe it is.

If nothing else, The Big Chill features an incredible ensemble - as strong in their individual moments as they are as a group - that is incomparable. It asked questions that were pertinent at the time and projected real warmth that resonated strongly with audiences at the time. I like to watch it in the fall.

by Anonymousreply 40November 10, 2014 3:43 PM

R40 is jealous that WASPs made a movie that Hollywood slavered over and copied 6000 times.

Hollywood is filled with useless emulators.

by Anonymousreply 42November 10, 2014 6:49 PM

Lens Dunham has a lot to say about it.

by Anonymousreply 43November 10, 2014 6:50 PM

A worthy homage to S7 is "Peter's Friends."

by Anonymousreply 44November 10, 2014 6:52 PM

Peter's Friends was very boring. Or was it?

by Anonymousreply 45November 10, 2014 6:55 PM

Not aged well, hmmm.... it was a piece of shit a quarter century ago!

by Anonymousreply 46November 10, 2014 7:25 PM

r45 LOVED "Peter's Friends," one of my all-time faves.

If it wasn't for the terrific music, this movie wouldn't be as fondly remembered.

by Anonymousreply 47November 10, 2014 7:58 PM

I loved it but haven't seen it recently.

by Anonymousreply 48November 10, 2014 8:07 PM

The '70s was all about fooling around...the '80s was about aids.

by Anonymousreply 49November 10, 2014 8:10 PM

There were a few people from that age who found causes...Iran-Contra? El Salvadore. Watching unions being stopped on by Reagan and his corporate buddies...we certainly lost that war and our middle class is dying.

by Anonymousreply 50November 10, 2014 8:17 PM

R39 - They are not all successful.

by Anonymousreply 51November 10, 2014 8:30 PM

It's a world of extreme privilege. I mean these goofballs went to the University of Michigan and one writes for People, one's a tv star, one's a doctor, one's a lawyer, one's a rich drug dealer, one's a rich housewife, one has an entire chain of stores....The funny part was that it didn't strike people at the time how privileged they were....because it was the last time in American history when an average college education could actually create such a group. Actually it was five years too late to create such a group. But yes, there was a time in America when there was that much opportunity.

by Anonymousreply 52November 10, 2014 9:30 PM

I'm 34. I watched this a few years ago with some friends from college and none of us liked it. I'm sure if you came of age at the same time as these characters you can relate to it, but it left us cold. I love Reality Bites, but I imagine people 20-30 years younger than me will hate it for the same reason.

by Anonymousreply 53November 10, 2014 9:47 PM

The movie ended like a bad '80s sitcom.

[quote]KLINE: Is there any way to coordinate this airport transport?

[quote]HURT: I'd be glad to drive somebody.

[quote]PLACE: Great, if we can take Harold's car. Get Harold to drive it.

[quote]GOLDBLUM: That won't be necessary. You see, Sarah, Harold, we took a secret vote. We're not leaving. We're never leaving.

Cue laughter, "Joy to the World," and the end credits rolling. All it was missing was the freeze frame.

by Anonymousreply 54November 10, 2014 9:50 PM

I didn't like how the songs were shoehorned into the movie. As soon as one ended, another began almost immediately. It was off-putting.

by Anonymousreply 55November 10, 2014 9:51 PM

Sadly, I myself was in the St. Elmo's Fire and About Last Night... generation...

by Anonymousreply 56November 10, 2014 9:53 PM

I did love the movie and soundtrack at the time, but it wasn't a favorite in repeats and I have no interest in seeing it again.

by Anonymousreply 57November 10, 2014 10:19 PM

I liked the television series "30 Something," which was obviously inspired by this film.

by Anonymousreply 58November 10, 2014 10:29 PM

I agree about Secaucus Seven. Had heard about it as being the original Big Chill and a classic, yadda yadda. Checked it out when it was on Netflix instant streaming and oh my God. It was unwatchable. Just because John Sayles went on to be a respected filmmaker does not mean his first effort was a classic or even competent.

Loved The Big Chill when it came out, but especially considering Kasdan's later output, seems a bit slick and soulless in retrospect. And even when I was a kid (which I was when I first saw it), I knew there was something off about Glenn Close intentionally setting up her husband to have sex with their friend as a sort of combination karma-payoff (for her having had an affair with Alex years ago) and help so her friend could be a mom. It was one of those "awwwwww, so sweet and selfless" things that is great theoretically but won't remotely work in real life. It's not bad enough that they're doing it IN GLENN'S BED while Glenn is there in the house, but the intent is for Mary Kay Place to get pregnant, which probably won't happen immediately, so there will be more hook-ups (she's in her 30s so it could take several tries every month for six months or more), then when she actually gets pregnant and has the kid...Glenn thinks Kevin Kline won't want to be involved in its upbringing? Of course he will. Her "selfless act" means her husband will be having sex with her friend for months then intimately involved in bringing up their kid for at least 18 years. Absolute insanity.

And yes, I always found JoBeth Williams's character a whiny pain in the ass.

Jeff Goldblum was kind of hot in an uber-nerdy Jewish way, though.

by Anonymousreply 59November 10, 2014 10:34 PM

Over-rated! The only interesting scene was Kevin Kline jogging in his short shorts.

Also, Meg Tilly seemed to be in a wasted role. Though, I did have a horrendous crush on William Hurt at the time.

by Anonymousreply 60November 10, 2014 10:52 PM

Meg Tilly was there to show the next generation.

by Anonymousreply 61November 10, 2014 10:56 PM

I don't understand why The Big Chill is considered a classic, and one of the best 80s film ever made. I found it boring and insipid.

by Anonymousreply 62November 10, 2014 10:57 PM

Lawrence Kasden's best was Body Heat, I still love it.

by Anonymousreply 63November 10, 2014 10:58 PM

I liked Meg Tilly in Masquerade, but not in this film. As if she was there for no reason.

by Anonymousreply 64November 10, 2014 11:00 PM

That director was always awful. Always. And this was always a bland POS, even when it opened. I had to walk out. You're just NOW seeing what an awful movie it is. It always WAS an awful movie by a schlocky schmaltzy director.

by Anonymousreply 65November 10, 2014 11:03 PM

awful movie - it existed to make hippies feel good about becoming yuppies.

by Anonymousreply 66November 10, 2014 11:59 PM

You really are a brain dead idiot, R65. Nothing more than a fool.

by Anonymousreply 67November 11, 2014 3:33 AM

Bill Hurt is the best thing in the movie. I don't think he was really acting--my impression from interviews is that he likes mindfucking with people.

Otherwise the film would have sunk like a stone w/o the soundtrack. Terrible direction and no apparent chemistry among the cast. Kasdan has lied about the influence of Secaucus 7--it ran forever in many places and had real buzz. The production values of Secaucus 7 were terrible, but it tapped into the same themes w/o the tedious self-consciousness.

by Anonymousreply 68November 11, 2014 3:52 AM

R68 - I think he was the best in the movie as well.

by Anonymousreply 69November 11, 2014 4:01 AM

Did anyone mentions G's tiny little titties?

by Anonymousreply 70November 11, 2014 4:02 AM

[quote]Kasdan has lied about the influence of Secaucus 7--it ran forever in many places and had real buzz.

Does he deny seeing it? What's the story r68?

by Anonymousreply 71November 11, 2014 4:05 AM

Meg Tilly is now a writer. Actually, she has always written. She first published a poem in "Seventeen" magazine before she became famous.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 72November 11, 2014 5:53 AM

Tilly is back to acting. She won some Canadian Emmy type thing a few years ago.

by Anonymousreply 73November 11, 2014 5:57 AM

None of them, especially G, could dance. That scene in the kitchen was embarrassing.

by Anonymousreply 74November 11, 2014 5:59 AM

Does anyone care about Canadian entertainment awards? You never hear about the Junos (their Grammys), the Geminis (their Emmys), or the Genies (their Oscars).

by Anonymousreply 75November 11, 2014 6:02 AM

[quote]That director was always awful. Always.

The Accidental Tourist was a delight and Body Heat was very enjoyable. Good film of its kind.

by Anonymousreply 76November 11, 2014 6:32 AM

I watch the film now and think "I'm ten years older than these actors were then and they are so much more adult and mature than me." People in their 30s seemed so much older then. (I find Thirtysomething the same.)

by Anonymousreply 77November 11, 2014 6:41 AM

I agree that the film had many flaws but don't assume everyone of that era and age group lived or aspired to that professional fantasy as depicted. It mirrored a lot of tv backstory invention which set the tone for the story - not intended as the focal point, but might be pointed social commentary about privilege or whatever

. Many of us were scraping by in low wage jobs, driving beater type cars, living with multiple roommates or living alone in a less than fine rental. There wasn't a consensus acceptance that the characters depicted real life - how realistically do current films depict lifestyle of the majority of 20-30 somethings? Films often present a skewed picture of an era. It sounds like some posters here don't see that about TBC - that's not a criticism, it's merely an observation of very understandable presumptions about a past era based on films.

by Anonymousreply 78November 11, 2014 6:46 AM

Kasdan used to claim he'd never heard of "Secaucus 7". Then he claimed he'd heard of it but never saw it. Both equally unlikely. His one innovation was that he'd attended U Michigan (like the characters in the film).

Secaucus 7 is much truer to life--no one is a celeb. The one person with show business dreams has failed. People work pretty regular jobs. The one person who's political is a Congressional staffer, not a big shot, and rather pragmatic about things. There is a cock plotline (Kasdan has one in Big Chill, although it's about having a cock shot off rather than having a big one which was what Sayles used in Secaucus 7).

Body Heat seems dated and predictable now, but seemed very good and showcased relatively new actors. Otherwise, Kasdan's films tended to fall flat like Big Chill.

by Anonymousreply 79November 17, 2014 1:23 AM

I have not seen this movie. Actually, I don't think I have ever even noticed it on TV.

by Anonymousreply 80April 9, 2015 1:15 AM

They should do a remake with the Jersey shore cast. More laughs than a bunch of pretentious white baby boomers guaranteed.

by Anonymousreply 81April 19, 2018 11:19 PM

I thought the soundtrack was really clichéd.

by Anonymousreply 82April 19, 2018 11:29 PM
Sarah Jenkins
Author

Sarah Jenkins

Sarah Jenkins is a veteran tech journalist with over 12 years of experience covering artificial intelligence, mobile innovations, and digital ethics. Her insights have appeared in leading technology publications worldwide.