Aurora is generally more expensive than RDS for the same workloads. It is priced based on the type and size of the instance and EBS volume. Aurora pricing is mainly based on instance size and storage is billed according to actual usage. Keep in mind that read replicas represent an extra cost on both platforms.

Is Amazon Aurora better than MySQL?

Conclusion. Amazon Aurora RDS offers features and performance that make it competitive with commercial databases, but with a much more manageable price point. RDS Aurora MySQL can outperform RDS MySQL by up five times in synthetic benchmark tests, and offers noticeable performance improvements in real world workflows.

Is Aurora better than RDS?

Unlike Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL, where high write workloads can severely impact replication, Aurora uses shared storage for writer and readers. … If the read workload can’t afford high replication lag and requires more than five read replicas, Aurora PostgreSQL is a better choice.